United States v. Savino Braxton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2022·No. 21-7543·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAVINO BRAXTON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:09-cr-00478-JKB-1)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Savino Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s prior order granting in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Though the court previously reduced Braxton’s prison sentence from 246 months to 168 months, Braxton’s reconsideration motion sought an even greater reduction based on new factual developments. Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that reconsideration was not warranted. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir.) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Savino Braxton, (4th Cir. 2022).

United States v. Savino Braxton (United States v. Savino Braxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ryan Kibble
992 F.3d 326 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)