United States v. Saunders

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Saunders

474 F. App'x 128

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2012·No. No. 12-6651·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Saunders, No. 2:06-cr-00162-RAJ-JEB-4 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 5, 2012 & entered Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[129] quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Saunders, No. 2:06-cr-00162-RAJ-JEB-4 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 5, 2012 & entered Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[129] quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Saunders, 474 F. App'x 128 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 128 (United States v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related