United States v. Saunders

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Saunders. Read the opinion of the Court — 501 F.3d 384
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2009·No. 09-6429·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6429

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NIKITA L. SAUNDERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00065-HEH-1)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nikita L. Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nikita L. Saunders appeals the district court’s order

denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Saunders, No.

3:06-cr-00065-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 17, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Saunders, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Saunders (United States v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related