United States v. Saulter
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8229
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DION SAULTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:02-cr-00022-BO-2)
Submitted: August 6, 2010 Decided: August 18, 2010
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dion Saulter, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Dion Saulter appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Saulter, No. 7:02-cr-00022-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 20, 2009;
entered Nov. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Saulter (United States v. Saulter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.