United States v. Saulter

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2010·No. 09-8229·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8229

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DION SAULTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:02-cr-00022-BO-2)

Submitted: August 6, 2010 Decided: August 18, 2010

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dion Saulter, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dion Saulter appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Saulter, No. 7:02-cr-00022-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 20, 2009;

entered Nov. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Saulter, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Saulter (United States v. Saulter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related