United States v. Sartor
This text of United States v. Sartor (United States v. Sartor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7182
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EMERSON WADDELL SARTOR, II,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cr-00128-H-1)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emerson Waddell Sartor, II, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Emerson Waddell Sartor, II, appeals the district
court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Sartor, No. 7:05—cr-
00128-H-1 (E.D.N.C. May 29, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Sartor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sartor-ca4-2009.