United States v. Santiago

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Santiago

649 F. App'x 319

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2016·No. No. 15-7934·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Santiago appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Santiago, No. 3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Santiago appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Santiago, No. 3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Santiago, 649 F. App'x 319 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

649 F. App'x 319 (United States v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related