United States v. Sanders

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Sanders

472 F. App'x 206

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 30, 2012

DocketNo. 11-7579

StatusPublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 206 (United States v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sanders, 472 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Warren Sanders appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence, on the court’s own motion, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Sanders, No. 3:03-cr-00086-1 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Warren Sanders appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence, on the court’s own motion, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Sanders, No. 3:03-cr-00086-1 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 F. App'x 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sanders-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack