United States v. Sanders

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8493

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WARREN SANDERS, a/k/a Charlie Brown, a/k/a William McKinney, a/k/a New York Mike,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00086-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Warren Sanders appeals the district court’s order

reducing his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Sanders, No. 3:03-cr-

00086-1 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 21, 2008), and the reasons expressed in

our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247,

253-56 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED