United States v. Sanders
This text of United States v. Sanders (United States v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8493
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WARREN SANDERS, a/k/a Charlie Brown, a/k/a William McKinney, a/k/a New York Mike,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00086-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Warren Sanders appeals the district court’s order
reducing his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Sanders, No. 3:03-cr-
00086-1 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 21, 2008), and the reasons expressed in
our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247,
253-56 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Sanders, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sanders-ca4-2009.