United States v. Sanders
This text of 55 F. App'x 213 (United States v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Melvin Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Sanders has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Sanders, Nos. CR-93-281; CA-02-710-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Oct. 17, 2002; entered Oct. 18, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 F. App'x 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sanders-ca4-2003.