United States v. Sanchez-Roque

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Sanchez-Roque

672 F. App'x 318

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2017·No. No. 16-7152·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Sanchez-Roque appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(C)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanchez-Roque, No. 3:12-cr-00152-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [319] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Sanchez-Roque appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(C)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanchez-Roque, No. 3:12-cr-00152-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [319] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Sanchez-Roque, 672 F. App'x 318 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

672 F. App'x 318 (United States v. Sanchez-Roque) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related