United States v. Sanchez-Lazo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2006·No. 05-41826·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-41826 Clerk Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISIDRO SANCHEZ-LAZO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-692 --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Isidro Sanchez-

Lazo raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Garcia-Mendez, 420 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126

S. Ct. 1398 (2006), which held that a Texas conviction for

burglary of a habitation was equivalent to burglary of a dwelling

and therefore was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, and

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-41826 -2-

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sanchez-Lazo, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Sanchez-Lazo (United States v. Sanchez-Lazo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Garcia-Mendez
420 F.3d 454 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)