United States v. Sanchez-Campos

295 F. App'x 166
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2008·No. No. 06-50531·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Felipe Sanchez-Campos appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sanchez-Campos contends that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), is no longer valid and that the fact of a prior conviction must be admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-14 (9th Cir.2000).

Sanchez-Campos also contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to take into account his rehabilitation and the fact that his sentence is much longer than any sentence he received for prior criminal convictions. We conclude that there was no procedural error and that Sanchez-Campos’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 990-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sanchez-Campos, 295 F. App'x 166 (9th Cir. 2008).

295 F. App'x 166 (United States v. Sanchez-Campos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Carty
520 F.3d 984 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda
234 F.3d 411 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)