United States v. Sanches-Raudales
Opinion
Case: 25-50212 Document: 49-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/25/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
____________ FILED November 25, 2025 No. 25-50212 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Rolando Heriberto Sanches-Raudales,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:24-CR-2366-1 ______________________________
Before Stewart, Graves, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Rolando Heriberto Sanches-Raudales appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that the statutory sentencing enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. As he correctly concedes, this issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-50212 Document: 49-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/25/2025
No. 25-50212
Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief. Because summary affirmance is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Sanches-Raudales (United States v. Sanches-Raudales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.