United States v. Samuels

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Samuels

304 F. App'x 140

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2008·No. No. 08-7045·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Samuels appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 [141]*141(2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Samuels, No. 2:93-cr-00066-HCM-5 (E.D.Va. May 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Samuels appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 [141]*141(2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Samuels, No. 2:93-cr-00066-HCM-5 (E.D.Va. May 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Samuels, 304 F. App'x 140 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

304 F. App'x 140 (United States v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related