United States v. Samuel S. Smith and Grover Lamar Lee, A/K/A Poss
594 F.2d 1084, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14809
Opinion
The Government has filed a petition for rehearing in this case, insisting that the Court based its reversal of appellant Lee’s conviction on errors of law and fact. In response to one of the points raised in the petition, we add clarifying language to the first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 119 1 so that it reads:
The Court should have explained that in order to secure the conviction of -a particular defendant, the Government had to prove two distinct things: (1) that a conspiracy began in late July (and continued through November 16, 1976) and (2) that as part of the common scheme, that defendant knowingly became part of and participated in the conspiracy.
As modified, our opinion stands; the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
1
. 588 F.2d 111, 119.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Samuel S. Smith and Grover Lamar Lee, A/K/A Poss, 594 F.2d 1084, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14809 (5th Cir. 1979).
594 F.2d 1084 (United States v. Samuel S. Smith and Grover Lamar Lee, A/K/A Poss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. King
73 F.3d 1564 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Grover Lamar Lee, A/K/A "Poss" Lee
695 F.2d 515 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Marcano
508 F. Supp. 462 (D. Puerto Rico, 1980)
United States v. Grover Lamar Lee
622 F.2d 787 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John Martins
612 F.2d 906 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)