United States v. Samuel

627 F. App'x 213
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2015
DocketNo. 15-7292
StatusPublished

This text of 627 F. App'x 213 (United States v. Samuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Samuel, 627 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

[214]*214Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Otis Samuel, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Samuel’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2014). We have reviewed the record and •find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Samuel, No. 4:13-cr-00321-RBH-1 (D.S.C. July 24, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Brown
653 F.3d 337 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
627 F. App'x 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuel-ca4-2015.