United States v. Samuel

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Samuel

627 F. App'x 213

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2015·No. No. 15-7292·Published

Opinion

[214] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Otis Samuel, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Samuel’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2014). We have reviewed the record and •find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Samuel, No. 4:13-cr-00321-RBH-1 (D.S.C. July 24, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[214] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Otis Samuel, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Samuel’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2014). We have reviewed the record and •find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Samuel, No. 4:13-cr-00321-RBH-1 (D.S.C. July 24, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Samuel, 627 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

627 F. App'x 213 (United States v. Samuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related