United States v. Samuel Adam Buchanan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 19, 2025·No. 24-11726·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-11726 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 02/19/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11726 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAMUEL ADAM BUCHANAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:19-cr-00359-ACA-GMB-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-11726 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 02/19/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11726

Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: John Lloyd, appointed counsel for Samuel Buchanan in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is cor- rect. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order denying Buchanan’s mo- tion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Samuel Adam Buchanan, (11th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Samuel Adam Buchanan (United States v. Samuel Adam Buchanan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)