United States v. Samuel Adam Buchanan

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11726

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SAMUEL ADAM BUCHANAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:19-cr-00359-ACA-GMB-1

____________________

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11726

Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:

John Lloyd, appointed counsel for Samuel Buchanan in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct . Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order denying Buchanan’s motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) is AFFIRMED.