United States v. Salinas

101 F. App'x 486
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Salinas. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 F. App'x 216
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2004·No. 03-50599·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Walter M. Reaves, Jr., appointed to represent Juan Francisco Salinas on direct appeal, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Salinas has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Based on our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Salinas, 101 F. App'x 486 (5th Cir. 2004).

101 F. App'x 486 (United States v. Salinas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)