United States v. Salinas

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Salinas. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 F. App'x 628
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2002·No. 01-50246·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50246 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN SALINAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR—00-CR-653-1 -------------------- August 21, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel representing Martin Salinas has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Salinas was

provided with a copy of counsel's Anders motion and brief. His

initial response requesting the dismissal of his second appeal

was ambiguous; therefore, the court requested a clarification of

his response. Salinas has not responded.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-50246 -2-

Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief

shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.; FED. R. APP.

P. 34(a)(2)(A).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Salinas, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Salinas (United States v. Salinas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)