United States v. Salazar-Montes

115 F. App'x 270
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. Nos. 04-50703, 04-50704·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Noe Salazar-Montes raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Salazar-Montes, 115 F. App'x 270 (5th Cir. 2004).

115 F. App'x 270 (United States v. Salazar-Montes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chacon-Avitia v. United States
544 U.S. 996 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Bishop v. United States
544 U.S. 995 (Supreme Court, 2005)