United States v. Salazar

289 F. App'x 809

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Salazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Salazar has filed a response. Salazar also has moved for appointment of new counsel and leave to proceed pro se. Salazar’s motions are DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Salazar’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.