United States v. Salazar

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Salazar. Read the opinion of the Court — 178 F. App'x 397
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. 06-20630·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 25, 2007

No. 06-20653 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SALVADOR FERNANDO MOLINA GARCIA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-371-2

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Salvador Fernando Molina Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Molina Garcia has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Molina Garcia’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-20653

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Molina Garcia’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Salazar, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Salazar (United States v. Salazar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)