United States v. Salazar

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Salazar

473 F. App'x 217

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 8, 2012

DocketNo. 11-7574

StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 217 (United States v. Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Salazar, 473 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Martin F. Salazar appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification or termination of supervised release. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in Salazar’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Salazar’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Salazar has forfeited appellate review. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Martin F. Salazar appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification or termination of supervised release. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in Salazar’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Salazar’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Salazar has forfeited appellate review. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F. App'x 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-salazar-ca4-2012.