United States v. Salazar

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7391

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARTIN F. SALAZAR,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00123-MBS-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2010 Decided: September 20, 2010

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin F. Salazar, Appellant Pro Se. Dean A. Eichelberger, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Martin F. Salazar appeals the district court’s order

denying his repetitive motion for a new trial. The district

court had previously denied several motions by Salazar for a new

trial, including two motions raising essentially the identical

“new evidence” raised in Salazar’s instant motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Salazar, No. 1:06-cr-00123-MBS-1 (D.S.C. April 7, 2008

& June 29, 2009). We deny Salazar’s motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED