United States v. Sakyi

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2009·No. 09-6508·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6508

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

COLLINS KUSI SAKYI,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00181-WCS-2)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Collins Kusi Sakyi, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Collins Kusi Sakyi appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to file a late 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006)

motion, his petition for writ of error corum nobis, and his

request for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sakyi’s

request for court appointed counsel and affirm the district

court’s order for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v. Sakyi, No. 1:97-cr-00181-WCS-2 (E.D. Va. filed

Jan. 13, 2009; entered Jan. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sakyi, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Sakyi (United States v. Sakyi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related