United States v. Sakyi
Opinion
Collins Kusi Sakyi seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration of the court’s rejection of his motion to supplement or amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Eed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Sakyi seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
305 F. App'x 1000 (United States v. Sakyi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.