United States v. Saenz-Franco
This text of 155 F. App'x 956 (United States v. Saenz-Franco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Antonio Saenz-Franco appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
As the district court sentenced SaenzFranco at a time when the United States Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, and they are now discretionary, we remand to the district court to determine if Saenz-Franco should receive a different sentence under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines system consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 F. App'x 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-saenz-franco-ca9-2005.