United States v. Rutland

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 31, 2009·No. 09-7746·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7746

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

QUENTIN ORLANDO RUTLAND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00031-RLV-3)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 31, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quentin Orlando Rutland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Quentin Orlando Rutland appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of

the district court. See United States v. Rutland, No. 5:02-cr-

00031-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rutland, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Rutland (United States v. Rutland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related