United States v. Rushie

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rushie

543 F. App'x 314

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2013·No. No. 13-7296·Published

Opinion

[315] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Everton Rushie appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rushie, No. 1:00-cr00396-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 2013). We deny Rushie’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[315] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Everton Rushie appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rushie, No. 1:00-cr00396-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 2013). We deny Rushie’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Rushie, 543 F. App'x 314 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

543 F. App'x 314 (United States v. Rushie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related