United States v. Ruiz-Zunigo

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ruiz-Zunigo

667 F. App'x 825

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2016·No. No. 16-6321·Published

Opinion

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding ■ precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hector Edgardo Ruiz-Zunigo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons' stated by the district court. United States v. Ruiz-Zunigo, No. 7:05-cr-00039-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding ■ precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hector Edgardo Ruiz-Zunigo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons' stated by the district court. United States v. Ruiz-Zunigo, No. 7:05-cr-00039-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Ruiz-Zunigo, 667 F. App'x 825 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 825 (United States v. Ruiz-Zunigo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related