United States v. Ruiz

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ruiz. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 F.3d 675
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 9, 2002·No. 01-40621·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40621 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CARLOS RUIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-578-3 -------------------- May 8, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Carlos Ruiz appeals from a guilty-plea conviction for

smuggling an illegal alien in the United States in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1324(a). Ruiz argues that the district court erred in

adding eight levels to his base offense level for a death that

occurred during the course of the offense. See U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.1(b)(6)(4).

We review the district court’s application of the Sentencing

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40621 -2-

Guidelines de novo and findings of fact for clear error. See

United States v. Paul, 274 F.3d 155, 161 (5th Cir. 2001). The

record in Ruiz’s case establishes by a preponderance of the

evidence that the eight-level increase was justified. See id. at

164. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ruiz, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Ruiz (United States v. Ruiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ronald Scott Paul
274 F.3d 155 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)