United States v. Rufus

654 F. App'x 603
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2016·No. No. 16-6181·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rufus, 654 F. App'x 603 (4th Cir. 2016).

654 F. App'x 603 (United States v. Rufus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Writs
28 U.S.C. § 1651