United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega. Read the opinion of the Court — 685 F.3d 1138
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2013·No. 10-50249·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 10-50249 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. v. 5:09-cr-00024-VAP-1

RUFINO IGNACIO VALDES- VEGA , ORDER Defendant - Appellant.

Filed April 25, 2013

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega, (9th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega (United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.