United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega

714 F.3d 1134, 2013 WL 1760865, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8395
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega. Read the opinion of the Court — 685 F.3d 1138
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2013·No. 10-50249·Published

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega, 714 F.3d 1134, 2013 WL 1760865, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8395 (9th Cir. 2013).

714 F.3d 1134 (United States v. Rufino Valdes-Vega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.