United States v. Rudd

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 8, 2008·No. 08-6484·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PATRICK LEWIS RUDD, a/k/a Louie, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (7:97-cr-00063-H-3)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Lewis Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b), in which he sought to receive credit on his federal sentence

for time served in state custody before his federal conviction. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Rudd, No. 7:97-cr-00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C.

Dec. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rudd, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Rudd (United States v. Rudd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.