United States v. Rudd

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rudd

203 F. App'x 458

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2006·No. 06-7040·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reinstate the appeal period. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rudd, No. 7:97-er00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2006; entered May 19, 2006 & filed May 15, 2006; entered May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reinstate the appeal period. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rudd, No. 7:97-er00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2006; entered May 19, 2006 & filed May 15, 2006; entered May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Rudd, 203 F. App'x 458 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

203 F. App'x 458 (United States v. Rudd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.