United States v. Roy Lee Johnson

996 F.2d 836, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16875
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 1993
Docket91-1200
StatusPublished

This text of 996 F.2d 836 (United States v. Roy Lee Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Roy Lee Johnson, 996 F.2d 836, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16875 (6th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

996 F.2d 836

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roy Lee JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 91-1200, 91-1201.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

July 2, 1993.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court 986 F.2d 134 is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Roy L. Johnson
986 F.2d 134 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Johnson
996 F.2d 836 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
996 F.2d 836, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roy-lee-johnson-ca6-1993.