United States v. Johnson

996 F.2d 836, 1993 WL 247426
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 1993
DocketNos. 91-1200, 91-1201
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 996 F.2d 836 (United States v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Johnson, 996 F.2d 836, 1993 WL 247426 (6th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

[837]*837ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en bane. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the ease on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court 986 F.2d 134 is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Roy Lee Johnson
996 F.2d 836 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
996 F.2d 836, 1993 WL 247426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-johnson-ca6-1993.