United States v. Rouse

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7745

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY K. ROUSE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00015-jpj-2)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 21, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony K. Rouse, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony K. Rouse appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2009). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

United States v. Rouse, No. 3:01-cr-00015-jpj-2 (W.D. Va. Sept.

4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED