United States v. Ross
454 U.S. 891, 102 S. Ct. 386
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 13, 1981·No. No. 80-2209·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis and certiorari granted. The parties are directed to address the question whether the Court should reconsider Robbins v. California, 453 U. S. 420 (1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ross, 454 U.S. 891, 102 S. Ct. 386 (1981).
454 U.S. 891 (United States v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Carlo Scott Bagley
765 F.2d 836 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Raul Freire, Antonio Maria Rubio, Jorge Mastrapa, and Hector Guillermo Pupo
710 F.2d 1515 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Anthony O. Kelly, Peter Kanelopoulos, Dana Cheney and James H. Orrell, United States of America v. Peter J. Weyland
683 F.2d 871 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
People v. Belton
432 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
State v. Capps
641 P.2d 484 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1982)
United States v. Charles M. Russell
670 F.2d 323 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Michael Ray Haley William Harry Riehl
669 F.2d 201 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)
Gill v. State
625 S.W.2d 307 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)