United States v. Rose

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rose

667 F. App'x 823

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2016·No. No. 16-6066·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dunte Elair Rose appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Rose, No. 5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4 (W.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2016); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[824] tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dunte Elair Rose appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Rose, No. 5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4 (W.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2016); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[824] tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Rose, 667 F. App'x 823 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 823 (United States v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related