United States v. Rose
This text of 667 F. App'x 823 (United States v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dunte Elair Rose appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Rose, No. 5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4 (W.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2016); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[824]*824tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rose-ca4-2016.