United States v. Rose

295 F. App'x 574

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Stuart Rose appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rose, No. 3:03-cr-444 (E.D. Va. May 16 & 29, 2008). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.