United States v. Rose

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6593

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

COLIN ROSE, a/k/a Turbo, a/k/a Damien Young,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-225-A)

Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Colin Rose, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Colin Rose appeals the district court’s order denying his

motions to reduce his sentence and for a downward departure under

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.0 (2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Rose, No. CR-97-225-A (E.D. Va. filed

Mar. 15, 2002; entered Mar. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED