United States v. Rose
This text of 35 F. App'x 378 (United States v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Colin Rose appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to reduce his sentence and for a downward departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.0 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Rose, No. CR-97-225-A (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 15, 2002; entered Mar. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [379]*379the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 F. App'x 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rose-ca4-2002.