United States v. Rose
71 M.J. 102, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 135
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 17, 2012
DocketNo. 09-5003/AF
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 71 M.J. 102 (United States v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Rose, 71 M.J. 102, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 135 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 36508. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL [103]*103ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Rose
71 M.J. 138 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 102, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rose-armfor-2012.