United States v. Rosa-Agosto

First Circuit

United States v. Rosa-Agosto

144 F. App'x 119

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedOctober 4, 2005

Docket04-2703

StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. App'x 119 (United States v. Rosa-Agosto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Rosa-Agosto, 144 F. App'x 119 (1st Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the record and briefs on appeal we affirm the decision below.

Among other problems, the appellant failed to make any showing that the amendment would operate to reduce his guideline range. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). As amended, he could obtain concurrent sentences under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b) only if the state sentences were used as relevant conduct and they were the basis for an increase in his offense level. He made no showing that the requirements were satisfied.

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the record and briefs on appeal we affirm the decision below.

Among other problems, the appellant failed to make any showing that the amendment would operate to reduce his guideline range. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). As amended, he could obtain concurrent sentences under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b) only if the state sentences were used as relevant conduct and they were the basis for an increase in his offense level. He made no showing that the requirements were satisfied.

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 F. App'x 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rosa-agosto-ca1-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack