United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon

322 F. App'x 888
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 2009
Docket08-16297
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 322 F. App'x 888 (United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon, 322 F. App'x 888 (11th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

*889 PER CURIAM:

James W. Smith, III, appointed counsel for Ronald Ray Langdon, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order denying Langdon’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon
379 F. App'x 886 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 F. App'x 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ronald-ray-langdon-ca11-2009.