United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon

322 F. App'x 888
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 10, 2009·No. 08-16297·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*889 PER CURIAM:

James W. Smith, III, appointed counsel for Ronald Ray Langdon, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order denying Langdon’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon, 322 F. App'x 888 (11th Cir. 2009).

322 F. App'x 888 (United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon
379 F. App'x 886 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)