United States v. Roman
This text of United States v. Roman (United States v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7228
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JORGE LUIS ROMAN, a/k/a Puerto Rican George,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:97-cr-00159-JBF-2)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 23, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jorge Luis Roman, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jorge Luis Roman appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his
motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Roman, No. 2:97-cr-00159-
JBF-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 5, 2008 & entered June 6, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Roman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roman-ca4-2008.