United States v. Rollins

Tenth Circuit

United States v. Rollins

682 F. App'x 687

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2017

Docket15-1459

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 682 F. App'x 687 (United States v. Rollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Rollins, 682 F. App'x 687 (10th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Affirmance, in which the government moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s sentencing determination in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). Defendant Shawn La Velle Rollins does not oppose the motion.

*688 Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Affirmance, in which the government moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s sentencing determination in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). Defendant Shawn La Velle Rollins does not oppose the motion.

*688 Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 F. App'x 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rollins-ca10-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack